How does Rebekah Taylor show Jim that she means no harm and that she does not wish to pursue a heated debate?
In the lecture, we discussed how the Rogerian style of argument requires a conciliatory style. How does Rebekah Taylor show Jim that she means no harm and that she does not wish to pursue a heated debate? How well does your own letter follow Rebekah Taylor’s example? What did you do well? How could you improve? Provide some examples. I will attach the lecture and my proposal for you to review. You can keep this under 300 words. No formal format
|Academic Level||College (3-4 years: Junior, Senior)|
|Number of Pages||1 Page(s)/275 words|